🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have decided to pull out from an global treaty created to safeguard females from violence, including family violence, following extensive and heated discussions in the parliament.

Thousands of protesters gathered in the capital this week to voice disagreement with the decision. The ultimate decision now rests with Head of State the nation's president, who must determine whether to approve or veto the legislation.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only took effect in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating governments to develop laws and assistance programs to eliminate all types of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the first European Union member to initiate the procedure of exiting from the treaty. Turkey withdrew in 2021, a decision that human rights organizations characterized as a significant setback for women's rights.

Political Debate and Resistance

The treaty was approved by the EU in last year, yet conservative factions have argued that its focus on equal rights weakens traditional families and promotes what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy debate in the Saeima, MPs decided by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the treaty, a move sponsored by opposition parties but supported by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a defeat for moderate conservative Prime Minister Evika Silina, who joined demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that violence will not prevail," she stated to the crowd.

Political Disagreements and Responses

One of the main parties advocating for the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose head has urged the public to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

Latvia's ombudswoman Karina Palkova appealed for the agreement not to be made political, while the organization Equality Now asserted it was "not a threat to national principles, it was an instrument to realize them".

The Thursday's vote has provoked widespread outcry both within the country and internationally.

22,000 people have endorsed a national appeal calling for the treaty to be preserved. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has called a demonstration for the coming week, accusing lawmakers of ignoring the will of the nation's citizens.

International Worries and Potential Future Actions

The head of the European organization's legislative body stated that the Baltic state had made a hasty choice driven by misinformation. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning step backward for women's rights and human rights in Europe".

He added that since Turkey abandoned the convention in 2021, cases of femicide and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not achieve a supermajority majority, the president could possibly return the legislation for further consideration if he holds objections.

Head of State Rinkevics stated on social media that he would assess the decision according to legal requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial considerations, rather than belief-based viewpoints".

Recently, another component of the governing alliance, the reformist party, indicated it would not rule out petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a worrisome development for gender equality not only in Latvia but across the continent," commented a human rights activist.

• Domestic abuse rates have been rising in multiple European countries
• The European treaty mandates particular legal protections for survivors of gender-based violence
• Latvia's decision could affect similar debates in additional EU countries